Funny how a fair candidate assessment requires a disclaimer afterwards assuring viewers that it’s not an endorsement.
Comments
I was late to this party. It's really sad, but the fact that a reporter can actually do a fair story about all things Paul leaves me almost speechless.
This guy is relatively friendly - his Twitter feed and Facebook page have exploded in popularity, and he seems pretty ok with it, even laughing about the "Ben Swann For Press Secretary" page a loyalist created.
He addressed a viewer's question about Paul's Iran policy on his page, and told us that his next story will be about Newt's claim that a secret panel review is all that is required to assassinate a 16 year old citizen.
I wonder if I should warn him what will happen when he posts something that isn't rabidly pro-Paul. :)
I was late to this party. It's really sad, but the fact that a reporter can actually do a fair story about all things Paul leaves me almost speechless.
This guy is relatively friendly - his Twitter feed and Facebook page have exploded in popularity, and he seems pretty ok with it, even laughing about the "Ben Swann For Press Secretary" page a loyalist created.
He addressed a viewer's question about Paul's Iran policy on his page, and told us that his next story will be about Newt's claim that a secret panel review is all that is required to assassinate a 16 year old citizen.
I wonder if I should warn him what will happen when he posts something that isn't rabidly pro-Paul. :)
Posted by: AngelaTC | 11/18/2011 at 09:33 PM
"I wonder if I should warn him what will happen when he posts something that isn't rabidly pro-Paul. :)"
After years of comment-section tongue-lashings by Paulians, one would believe he already knows.
It was very refreshing to see some fairness though, wasn't it? Almost downright objective at times...
Posted by: Eric Parks | 11/19/2011 at 11:03 AM